Apple has had some insanely ambitious goals in regards to television. In fact, there have been two separate plans within the company involving strengthening their position in the television and broadcast worlds. Unfortunately for Apple, it turns out that this market might just be outside of their reach.
First has been the longest running inside joke in the tech world: the Apple television. This is different from the Apple TV, their set-top box that relies on outside content: this would be an Apple-branded television. The rumors surrounding this theoretical product have been around almost as long as the Apple TV itself, with new details popping up surrounding every product announcement event. It has never materialized, however.
Thanks to the usual "people familiar with the subject" and
, we not know that Apple had been working on this product. However, the company disbanded the team responsible over a year ago. While some people in the tech world find this a surprise, I most certainly do not, and here's why: televisions suck. No one loves their television, because they are mostly a transient technology. No one spends enough time with the television itself to have an attachment to it.
The Wall Street Journal
In addition, there is nowhere to innovate in the television space. You could improve the possible picture quality, but content will never catch up. 3D never did become a reality, and 4K content is still far from being available to the world, meaning those expensive 4K televisions are in reality REALLY expensive 1080p televisions. Smart televisions are a dime a dozen and yet, despite the easy access to these features, people still use their Xbox and PlayStation to access Netflix, Hulu, YouTube and the like. Why? Because televisions do not have the processing power to do it well.
The only way that Apple could have tried to accomplish something interesting in the television space is if they provided their own content, guaranteeing that your new 4K television had 4K content, for example. The problem there is, Apple is not a content company. They may be good at getting people to buy their
patented rounded-corners, they do not produce anything real on a fixed schedule. Getting into producing content would be impossible, so partnering with other content providers would be their best bet. The problem there is that the content providers, it turns out, have no interest in talking with Apple about it at all.
The long-rumored streaming service appears to be shelved for the time being as well because of this. They believe that, in order to provide a full-functioned product, it would require live, local broadcasts from the Big 4. The Big 4 have
made it very clear, though, that they have no interest in letting this happen, and Apple is no exception. So, for now, it appears that anyone waiting for any Apple-branded television products will have to draw their own logo on their existing televisions because nothing is coming soon.
There is a terrible trend happening in the online gaming world called
Swatting. In case you have not heard of this practice, it involves one person finding the home information of another and calling in a fake emergency call. Usually the caller claims to be within the house of the victim (the other person) and is either holding the family hostage or that they have killed everyone in the house. Because of this call, the local SWAT team shows up and kicks down the door, often barging in on a Twitch broadcast.
Obviously this is a terribly dangerous "prank" that should be taken very seriously. Luckily, law enforcement has begun to take this seriously. Earlier this year there was
an arrest in Las Vegas in response to a well-publicized incident in July of last year. What it revealed was that these are not isolated incidents. In fact, the 19-year-old who was arrested had been involved in several incidents.
This week, a 17-year-old on trial in Canada pleaded guilty to 23 counts including several counts of swatting. While in most cases these "pranks" revolve around online videogame rivalries, this one turns out to have started even more ridiculously. The teenager met a girl from Florida online and began an online relationship. The problem is that the girl didn't know that this was what he thought was happening and rejected his reality. As a result he called in two threats to her school and one to her home.
These are not his only incidents, however. It turns out that, in more traditional fashion, he did look for further victims using
League of Legends and Twitter. He apparently got sloppy with the later incidents, as they were done while part of an 8-hour YouTube Live broadcast in which he pulled this "prank" more than once. It also ended up being what got him arrested when enough viewers of the stream called the police.
Because of this very stupid decision, it is likely that a large portion of his young adult life will be lost to jail time when his sentencing, which takes place on June 29th, is complete. It is important, like in the Vegas case, that an example be made to try and prevent future incidents where someone could really get hurt.
The BBC is planning, and in early production, of a TV movie entitled
Game Changer, a dramatic telling of the early days of Grand Theft Auto. The story will be told in similar fashion to the Ashton Kutcher movie about Steve Jobs, complete with skipping the whole "getting authorization" thing. The movie will feature Bill Paxton as "butt-of-the-joke" former attorney Jack Thompson and Daniel "Harry Potter" Radcliffe as Rockstar co-founder Sam Hauser.
That is assuming the movie actually happens. Rockstar Games' parent company, Take Two Interactive, announced Thursday that they had filed a trademark infringement suit against the BBC. If the suit goes through, it is unlikely that the BBC would actually produce the movie, likely opting for the easier road of canceling.
Take Two stressed in a statement that neither they nor Rockstar has had anything to do with the movie, saying,
Our goal is to ensure that our trademarks are not misused in the BBC's pursuit of an unofficial depiction of purported events related to Rockstar Games. We have attempted multiple times to resolve this matter with the BBC without any meaningful resolution. It is our obligation to protect our intellectual property, and unfortunately in this case litigation was necessary.
While any movie that features Jack Thompson is something that I would like to see, I do understand the desire to protect a brand. As with the previously mentioned Steve Jobs film, it is likely that incorrect information will be introduced into the narrative for either dramatic effect or, in Kutcher's case, to make one character more important than they really were.
The idea of having the story of your life or life's work told without any verification from you is something that makes my stomach hurt a bit, as people tend to believe what they see, no matter how obviously fake it may be. Hopefully the end result will be for the BBC and Rockstar to actually work together to produce a piece that tells the accurate story and shows Jack as the oddball he is.
turning a profit was not enough to save employees at struggling BlackBerry. The company announced they would be laying off an unspecified number of employees. It is expected that the majority of those layoffs will come from the devices business, including jobs in hardware, software and applications for the BlackBerry platform.
In the early days of smartphones, before consumers had really ever heard that term, BlackBerry regularly battled Palm to hold the #2 slot behind Microsoft's Windows Mobile platform, which often held strong in the #1 spot. Today, the smartphone landscape looks very different, with Android taking the top spot, and Microsoft and Apple battling for #2 from area to area. In North America, Apple tends to lead, while in Europe it's Microsoft. BlackBerry, however, barely makes the charts.
BlackBerry said in a statement,
As the company moves into its next stage of the turnaround, our intention is to reallocate resources in ways that will best enable us to capitalize on growth opportunities while driving toward sustainable profitability across all facets of our business...
One of our priorities is making our device business profitable. At the same time, we must grow software and licensing revenues. You will see in the coming months a significant ramping up in our customer-facing activities in sales and marketing.
Their software growth has begun to see a resurgence. For example, BlackBerry Messenger, which was always a favorite for businesses because of its security focus, has arrived on other platforms, bringing the brand name back to popularity. The app is actively maintained, with the Windows Phone app receiving an update this month.
In addition, Ford recently announced that their lower-end Ford Sync models would switch to a QNX-based system after Microsoft stopped developing the highly specialized platform to focus on the more universal Windows 10 platform. QNX is a company which was purchased by BlackBerry and was used to transition to BlackBerry 10, the OS that runs the now defunct PlayBook and all modern BlackBerry handsets.
Can this IBM-style focus on software and services work out better for the company, or will they eventually go the way of Palm and become part of a larger company (hopefully with a happier ending)? It is likely that, no matter the outcome, it will come to pass sooner rather than later.
Aereo's Supreme Court loss and corporate shutdown, the company's trademarks and customer list were purchased by TiVo out of bankruptcy. At the time, it seemed odd that TiVo, an established brand, would be interested in the trademarks of a defunct startup, but TigerDirect bought the trademarks of both Circuit City and CompUSA out of bankruptcy, so who were we to argue?
The company's plans for those assets came to light, at least out of the shadows, during an interview with Tom Rogers, TiVo's CEO last week. He said that the company was working on a product that would give cord cutters the ability to DVR and stream OTA content, going so far as to describe the product as "kind of the Aereo model, done legally and better." There is a problem with that business model, however: The Supreme Court of the United States ruled the practice illegal.
So, how on Earth does TiVo plan to revise the business model to make it legal? It's all guesses at this point, though a spokesperson for the company did say,
Yes, they are currently developing a product and although they are not releasing any details, they plan to hold a significant event in San Jose in late July to discuss it.
So, we won't have to wait too long to get the answers to our questions. The likely answer is that TiVo is planning on paying transmission fees to the affected broadcasters, though there is no real telling how they might come to a consensus about audience size and overall fees. It is also unknown whether the broadcasters will even be willing to discuss this possibility, as several of them have introduced their own branded version of this service, including ABC, CBS and NBC. There is also
Sling to compete with, which offers cable options in addition to the networks.