The announcement from Facebook earlier this year that they were working on launching a cryptocurrency called Libra immediately drew scrutiny, from other companies and governments the world over. It seems that Facebook, their subsidiary Calibra, and the other members of the Libra Association hadn't considered the possibility that there could be concerns over the platform before the announcement. Now, because of the backlash, the Financial Times reports that members of the Association are getting cold feet.
Two of the 28 founding members are considering leaving the Association entirely, for fear of getting tied up in Facebook's messes. It all stems from the inevitable regulations that will be implemented by the governments that don't ban Libra outright because of Cambridge Analytica. Many governments fear that the company's handling of a privacy issue that they were aware of more than a year before news broke on their behavior could be replicated at Libra. Others are worried that the tight ties between Facebook and Libra could cause problems for the value of fiat currencies, including the US dollar.
With increased scrutiny on Facebook, the associated companies are worried that being involved with Libra could bring problems to their businesses. One of the two companies considering exiting the Association is worried that their business will be put under a brighter government spotlight, while the other is concerned about increased regulation involving their own business, all because of their connection to Facebook.
On the other hand, it seems that Facebook is getting annoyed with the way things are going, as well, but for different reasons. Facebook is concerned about the fact that they are the only ones publicly speaking positively about the currency, despite everyone committing to promote the program. It is not a surprise that no one wants to talk about the program, however, for fear of retribution. With these issues, it is unlikely that Facebook's goal of a 2020 launch or 100 members of the Association will be hit.
It's been a few months since Apple announced its new subscription gaming service, Apple Arcade, at WWDC 2019. The service will come with a collection of games, including all in-app purchases and no advertisements. The service will launch this Fall and has been much anticipated for its Xbox Game Pass style take on mobile gaming. However, some apprehension has remained, as Apple never announced pricing for the new service. However, according to a new report this week, the price of the service will be $4.99 per month.
The pricing is not a huge surprise following Google's testing of Google Play Pass, a similar subscription service, adding apps to the game catalog, which is currently advertised at $4.99 per month. While Google separates itself by adding non-gaming apps, Apple's service will separate itself by eventually expanding to include Apple TV and macOS devices.
This move, from both Apple and Google, is aimed at trying to solve the current mobile gaming landscape problem. Today, mobile games come in two main varieties: free and paid. The free games are the most common and, while they sound nice, are usually specifically designed to encourage microtransactions which can easily make the game cost more than a paid game. On the other hand, paid games usually come without in-app purchases and advertisements, but also require a front-heavy price.
With a service like Apple Arcade or Google Play Pass, mobile gamers can get the full game experience without being bullied into buying skins, tools, or Pokeballs. The concept has proven to be popular on Xbox One and PC with the Xbox Game Pass, which brings console games to players for a monthly subscription. The same concept on mobile could have the potential to be even more popular with players because of the scourge of in-app purchases in mobile games.
One of the most popular and long-standing traditions in the Android ecosystem is the naming convention. While Android versions have numbers, like most software, they have also famously had development names that are taken from the names of desserts. Some have been generic, like Android 9 Pie, while others have been named in partnership with dessert brands, like Android 8 Oreo. Trying to guess what the name of the next version is going to be is one of the best parts of the development cycle. Unfortunately, that is all coming to an end right now.
Android is seeing its first branding update since 2014, and with the update comes the end of the sweet names. It's not a huge surprise that it is coming with Android 10 (the official and only name of the next version) because finding a dessert product that starts with a Q was going to be a challenge. Before this week's announcement, the internet was already ablaze with ideas on what the next version's name might be, and none of them were good. Quiche, the egg-based French dish was a front-runner, but it's not a sweet product. A renewed relationship with Nestle could have brought about Android 10 Quik, but that was a stretch.
In addition to the naming convention change, Android also saw a more noticeable branding update, affecting its logo and Bugdroid, the mascot for the operating system. The new logo uses a less bold font face, and removes the terrible lowercase n and r, replacing them with more standard looking letters. The new logo also comes along with a new color palette, starting with a new green and using orange, yellow, and three varieties of blue. The new colors come as Material Design 2 hits the Play Store, stripping it of its color entirely.
Everyone in the United States knows Viacom, whether they recognize the name or not. Viacom owns networks like MTV, Comedy Central, and Nickelodeon. The company, or more specifically the brand name, has had a long and bizarre history with broadcast company CBS. Viacom started out as CBS Films and was the syndication wing of CBS. It became Viacom (short for Video & Audio Communications) in 1970 and became its own, independent corporation in 1971. In 1999, Viacom acquired CBS through parent company Westinghouse Electric Company, making Viacom the new parent. In 2006, Viacom became CBS Corporation, and a new company, called Viacom, was created, to offload business that CBS no longer wanted.
This week, the two companies have agreed to once again become one in a merger that would create a media company worth roughly $30 billion. The new entity will be called ViacomCBS, putting the Viacom brand out front again. During a call with analysts, representatives from the companies said that the move was intended to help brands owned by both entities to better compete in the changing media landscape. In particular, they hope that the move will beef up their "direct-to-consumer" offerings, which the rest of us would call their online streaming.
Together, the merged company would own CBS All Access, SHOWTIME ANYTIME, Pluto TV, Noggin, and more. They are hoping that introducing kids' programming from the Nickelodeon brands into CBS All Access will help drive subscriptions, which have languished without many must-see programs.
The merger will still require regulatory approval, but the companies seem confident they will receive it quickly. In fact, they believe that the deal will be finalized before the end of the year. CBS shareholders will own 61% of ViacomCBS, but Viacom's head, Bob Bakish, will be President and CEO, while CBS's head, Jow Ianniello, will be Chairman of the corporation and CEO of CBS.
One of the hardest things to do online these days is protecting your privacy. Between tracking cookies, Facebook pixels, and the like, it can be difficult to keep websites from following you across the web. Incognito mode in your browser does an okay job of hiding your activity by preventing the cookies. Tools like PureVPN allow you to obfuscate your browsing history by adjusting your IP address, and even your global location, as you browse. Other tools, such as Tor, create an untraceable route to hide your activities. While there are certain ways to identify some users, these processes do a good job for most users.
The issue was discovered by Ronald Eikenberg, a reporter for c't, who published the story after Kaspersky was alerted to the problem. Kaspersky removed the code in an update released in June of this year, and they alerted users through a security advisory a month later. A statement from the company said,
Kaspersky has changed the process of checking webpages for malicious activity by removing the usage of unique identifiers for the GET requests. This change was made after Ronald Eikenberg reported to us that using unique identifiers for the GET requests can potentially lead to the disclosure of a user's personal information.
After our internal research, we have concluded that such scenarios of user's privacy compromise are theoretically possible but are unlikely to be carried out in practice, due to their complexity and low profitability for cybercriminals. Nevertheless, we are constantly working on improving our technologies and products, resulting in a change in this process.
We'd like to thank Ronald Eikenberg for reporting this to us.
Despite the company's belief that it was unlikely to be exploited, it is a fairly simple and financially rewarding process. If this had been discovered by others before this disclosure, it would have been easy to build a full browsing history for a unique user, which could have high value for marketers. It would also have been far more precise and less cumbersome than scanning the installed fonts, extensions, and configuration, which can also be used to identify some users, but not most, as the average user doesn't add fonts or extensions, or even change browser settings.
At the beginning of the month, popular Twitch streamer Tyler "Ninja" Blevins announced that he would be leaving his home of 8 years on Twitch to exclusively stream on Microsoft's Mixer platform. He was streaming the next day on Mixer, leaving his Twitch channel offline for the first time in a while. Ninja did a great job of keeping the transition smooth and professional, never saying anything bad about his former home because he had nothing negative to say. He had been happy on Twitch, but Microsoft made him an offer he couldn't refuse.
Twitch, on the other hand, did not treat the situation with the same level of professionalism. Unlike other channels, whose page shows previous streams and the ongoing chat for the user, Twitch changed Ninja's offline profile to promote other channels. The page showed the most popular active streams under the "Fortnite" category, which is the game that made Ninja a household name.
While that is already disrespectful to Ninja and his fans, what came next was worse. The top suggested stream listed on Ninja's page at one point was pron. It is important to remember that many of Ninja's biggest fans are children, making this even more disturbing. In response, Ninja tweeted out a video apology for a situation that he did not create, saying,
We haven't said anything bad or negative about Twitch, obviously, because there really hadn't been any reason to. Over the past couple of days there have been some things that have been going on that, you know, we let slide. They were kind of annoying. Little jabs, we felt like, but it didn't matter. We wanted to stay professional. But now, if you go to Twitch.tv/ninja, they advertise other channels. They don't do this for anyone else that's offline, by the way - just me. And there are also other streamers who have signed with other platforms whose stream and channel still remains the same. You can see their VODs, they don't promote other streams, they don't promote other popular channels. But they do on mine. I've been streaming for eight years to build my brand and build that channel: 14.5 million followers. And they were still using my channel to promote other streamers.
He goes on to discuss the porn incident, apologizing for the incident, and showing his frustration because he has no say in what is being shown attached to his name. Shortly after, Twitch CEO Emmett Shear sent his own series of tweets discussing the incident, stating,
Our community comes to Twitch looking for live content. To help ensure they find great, live channels we've been experimenting with showing recommended content across Twitch, including on streamer's pages that are offline.
This helps all streamers as it creates new community connections. However, the lewd content that appeared on the @ninja offline channel page grossly violates our terms of service, and we've permanently suspended the account in question.
We have also suspended these recommendations while we investigate how this content came to be promoted.
On a more personal note, I apologize want to apologize directly to @ninja that this happened. It wasn't our intent, but it should not have happened. No excuses.
Since the incident, Twitch has reverted Ninja's channel to a standard offline page, but it has brought up a long-standing issue with Twitch regarding their inconsistent rules enforcement. While there is an explicit content policy, it tends to apply less to popular female channels than it does to others. But, as Ninja points out,
his wouldn't even have been an issue if they didn't use my channel to promote others in the first place...